A blog about all things Arsenal
With Arsenal’s 2019/2020 Premier League campaign over, the team finishing a disappointing 8th in the Premier League (but qualifying for the Europa League via their FA Cup triumph) and the adjusted Summer transfer window now open, it’s an opportune time to examine the on-field production of each player in Arsenal’s senior squad, and the player market, in order to identify:
Methodology
In assessing the on-field production and the comparative ranking of each player which comprise Arsenal’s senior squad, each player is allocated into five positional categories (with some players allocated to multiple positional categories due to their perceived versatility).
Those positional categories consist of:
Once categorised, each player’s output in defined key performance indicators (KPIs) for their respective positional category has then been considered, using data sourced from Whoscored.com.
To provide a realistic picture of each individual player’s on-field production, only data from those seasons, throughout the player’s professional career, where the player has started at least 15 league games in at least two seasons (consecutive or non-consecutive) was considered. Where a player has not met that criteria, their productivity data was not assessed.
Different weightings were then assigned to the KPI data considered for each positional group based on the assumption that Arsenal adopt a 3-5-1-1 formation and the cornerstones of Arsenal’s tactical approach is as follows:
Once the relative on field productivity of Arsenal’s current senior squad was assessed, the comparative KPI data (from Whoscored.com) of the players competing in the following leagues was then reviewed:
When considering players competing in the aforementioned leagues, those players in clubs who are due to compete in the 2020/21 Champions League, were not considered. This included clubs such as Chelsea, Manchester City, Manchester United, Liverpool, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Atletico Madrid, Sevilla, Bayern Munich, Borussia Dortmund, RB Leipzig, Borussia Monchenglabach. PSG, Marseille, Rennes, Juventus, Inter Milan, Atalanta, and Lazio. This was designed to realistically account for Arsenal’s attractiveness as a prospective employer, based on the club’s current standing in European football (as a Europa League competitor).
Also, only players from the aforementioned leagues who have, during their professional career, started at least 15 league games in at least two seasons (consecutive or non-consecutive) were considered. Where a player has not met that criteria, their productivity data was not assessed. Again, this was designed to provide a realistic picture of each individual player’s on-field production.
The KPI data of the reviewed players was then contrasted against the KPI data of the players who currently comprise Arsenal’s senior squad, to identify prospective transfer targets.
Player rankings
Starting with the goalkeeping position, and while it’s unfair to judge Macey or Martinez’ suitability, as neither player has sufficient professional experience to appropriately assess their performances, it is fair to say that Bernd Leno, has delivered less impressive performances throughout his career to date, in contrast to the likes of Alessio Cragno of Cagliari.
In light of that, it would be logical for Arsenal to sell Leno, and recruit Cragno, to serve as one of the club’s two senior goalkeepers.
In terms of the second of those two senior goalkeepers, with Martinez and Macey unproven but both considered ‘homegrown’, and likely to see limited game time, it would be logical for the club to retain either one of Martinez or Macey as the club’s second senior goalkeeper. My preference would be Martinez.
As for the club’s contracted centre back options, Arsenal fortunately have two players in Mustafi and Sokratis, who can legitimately lay claim to having a sufficiently productive performance record to warrant selection as two of the club’s six senior centre backs.
As for the club’s other centre back options, while its unfair to judge Mavropanos, Holding, Saliba or Tierney, as all four players have insufficient professional experience in any of the considered leagues, to appropriately assess their performances, Luiz, Chambers and Kolasinac’s propensity to win aerial duels are inferior to a number of the players reviewed, and Luiz and Mari’s tackles per game records are similarly inferior.
Needless to say, Mustafi and Sokratis aside, Arsenal lack a sufficient number of adequately productive centre back options.
That being the case, it would be logical for Arsenal to sell Luiz, Chambers, Kolasinac and Mari, and recruit one of Jannik Vestergaard of Southampton, Kristian Pedersen of Birmingham, Sol Bamba of Cardiff or Salif Sane of Schalke, to serve alongside Mustafi and Sokratis as three of the club’s six senior central defenders.
In terms of the fourth, fifth and sixth centre backs, given the critical nature of defence, there is a strong argument that Arsenal should aim to recruit the next most productive centre backs available to fill those senior centre back roles. That being the case, Arsenal should sell Holding, Mavropanos and Saliba and recruit three of the following players:
In terms of the club’s contracted central midfield options, it’s unfair to judge Smith-Rowe, Elneny, and Willock’s suitability, as none of those players have had sufficient professional experience in any of the examined leagues, to appropriately assess their performances.
Regarding Arsenal’s other central midfield options, Torreira, Xhaka, Guendouzi, and Maitland-Niles’ tackles and key passes per match records are inferior to a number of the players reviewed. While Maitland-Niles’ passing accuracy is similarly inferior.
In light of the comparative deficiencies of Arsenal’s currently contracted central midfield options, it would be logical for Arsenal to sell Torreira, Xhaka, Guendouzi, and Maitland-Niles and, recruit the following players to serve as three of Arsenal’s six senior central midfielders:
In terms of the club’s fourth, fifth and sixth senior central midfielders, while having highly productive and proven players in the defence is critical, given their function as the last line of protection for Arsenal’s goalkeeper, there is a strong argument that Arsenal have more flexibility to utilise unproven players to fill the remaining central midfield spots. That being the case, and given the Premier League’s homegrown rule, it would be logical for Arsenal to sell Elneny, retain Smith-Rowe, and Willock, and recruit Will Hughes of Watford to fill Arsenal’s fourth, fifth and sixth senior central midfielder roles.
As for the club’s contracted wide midfield options, it’s unfair to judge Smith-Rowe, Saka, Nelson, Tierney or Martinelli’s suitability, as none of those players have had sufficient professional experience in the considered leagues, to appropriately assess their performances.
Regarding Arsenal’s other current wide midfield options, Pepe, Ozil, Lacazette, Aubameyang, Kolasinac, Bellerin and Maitland-Niles’ tackles per game records are inferior to a number of the players reviewed. While Aubameyang, Soares, Kolasinac and Maitland-Niles’ dribbles per match records are similarly inferior, as are Soares, Kolasinac and Bellerin’s key passes per game records.
In light of the comparative deficiencies of Arsenal’s currently contracted wide midfield options, it would be logical for Arsenal to sell Ozil, Maitland-Niles, Bellerin, Kolasinac and Soares, and recruit Teji Savanier of Montpellier and Emi Buendia of Norwich, to serve as two of Arsenal’s four senior wide midfielders.
In terms of the club’s third and fourth senior wide midfielders, as with Arsenal’s central midfielders, there is a strong argument that Arsenal have flexibility to utilise unproven players to fill a number of the wide midfield roles in the squad. That being the case, and given the Premier League’s homegrown rule, it would be logical for Arsenal to sell Martinelli, retain Nelson, and retain one of Saka and Tierney, to serve as the club’s third and fourth senior wide midfielders. Of Saka and Tierney, my preference would be to retain Saka.
In terms of the club’s contracted centre forward options, Pepe, Lacazette and Aubameyang are all deficient aerially, in contrast to a number of players reviewed.
In light of the comparative deficiency of Arsenal’s currently contracted centre forward options in this KPI, it would be logical for Arsenal to sell Lacazette, Pepe, and recruit Aleksanda Mitrovic of Fulham to serve as one of Arsenal’s two senior centre forwards.
In terms of the second centre forward in the squad, having highly productive and proven players in the centre forward and striker roles is critical, given their primary function is to score the bulk of the side’s goals. That being the case, it would be logical for Arsenal to also recruit Simon Terrode of FC Cologne.
In terms of the club’s contracted striker options, Arsenal fortunately have a player in Aubameyang, who can legitimately lay claim to having a sufficiently productive performance record to warrant selection as one of the club’s two senior strikers.
As for the club’s other striker options, while its unfair to judge Martinelli or Nketiah, as both players have insufficient professional experience in any of the considered leagues, to appropriately assess their performances, Pepe and Lacazette’s records in term of goals per season and shots per game are comparatively inferior to a considerable number of the players reviewed.
In light of that and there being a need to have highly productive and proven players in the striker role, given its primary function is to score the bulk of the side’s goals , it would be logical for Arsenal to sell Lacazette, Pepe, Martinelli and Nketiah, and recruit one of Hirving Lozano of Napoli, Raul Jimenez of Wolves, Teemu Pukki of Norwich or Arkadiusz Milik of Napoli to fill the second of Arsenal’s two senior striker roles. My preference would be Pukki, based on his relative value and experience in the English leagues.
Summary of proposed activity
Freddie08